Journal: EMBO Molecular Medicine
Article Title: uPA‐PAI‐1 heteromerization promotes breast cancer progression by attracting tumorigenic neutrophils
doi: 10.15252/emmm.202013110
Figure Lengend Snippet: A Deposition of uPA or PAI‐1 (green) in the cremaster muscle of WT mice as assessed separately ex vivo by confocal laser scanning microscopy 6 h after intrascrotal injection of TNF or saline, PECAM‐1/CD31 + postcapillary venules (red) and Ly‐6G + neutrophils (purple) are depicted. Representative images are shown (scale bar: 50 µm). B Expression of PECAM‐1/CD31 (red) and ICAM‐1/CD54 or VCAM‐1/CD106 (green) in the cremaster muscle of WT mice as assessed ex vivo by confocal laser scanning microscopy 6 h after intrascrotal injection of recombinant murine uPA‐PAI‐1 or saline, representative images (scale bar: 50 µm), and quantitative data are shown (mean ± SEM for n = 4 mice per group; # P < 0.05 vs. saline; t ‐test). C, D (C) Production of TNF was analyzed in mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages and (D) surface expression of ICAM‐1/CD54, VCAM‐1/CD106, uPA, and PAI‐1 on mouse bEnd.3 microvascular endothelial cells as assessed in vitro by multi‐channel flow cytometry upon exposure to recombinant murine uPA‐PAI‐1, TNF, or saline, quantitative data are shown (mean ± SEM for n = 4 experiments per group; # P < 0.05 vs. saline; one‐way ANOVA/ t ‐test). E, F (E) Binding of ICAM‐1/CD54‐Fc or VCAM‐1/CD106‐Fc to primary mouse neutrophils and (F) binding of conformation‐specific mABs to primary human neutrophils (“mAB 24” recognizing high‐affinity conformation, “kim127” recognizing intermediate and high‐affinity conformation of β 2 integrins) as assessed upon exposure to recombinant murine/human uPA‐PAI‐1, TNF, or saline by multi‐channel flow cytometry, a representative histogram plot and quantitative data are shown (mean ± SEM for n = 4–7 mice/human blood samples per group; # P < 0.05 vs. saline; one‐way ANOVA). G Quantitative analysis of LFA‐1/CD11a clustering on the surface of mouse neutrophils under increasing flow conditions in vitro in the presence of either E‐selectin/CD62E + ICAM‐1/CD54, E‐selectin/CD62E + ICAM‐1/CD54 + KC, or E‐selectin/CD62E + ICAM‐1/CD54 + KC + uPA‐PAI‐1 as assessed by spinning disk confocal microscopy, representative images and quantitative data are shown (scale bar: 10 µm; mean ± SD; n = 3 mice; n = 10–13 flow chambers, n = 122–222 cells); * P < 0.05 vs. E‐selectin/CD62E + ICAM‐1/CD54; one‐way ANOVA).
Article Snippet: After washing three times with PBS, the wells were incubated with recombinant uPA (0, 1, 5, 10 ng/ml, Molecular Innovations, Novi, Michigan, USA) each combined with different doses of the inhibitor WX‐340 (0, 0.1, 1, 10 µM).
Techniques: Ex Vivo, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy, Injection, Expressing, Recombinant, In Vitro, Flow Cytometry, Binding Assay, Confocal Microscopy